Problematic References in 10.1016/j.aej.2025.06.053
Several problematic references were found on the article [1].
The investigation by the 5GH Team revealed that eight references (Ref. 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 23, 24) are false. Searching their titles on Google Scholar returned no results. The investigation also revealed that the author and title for the Ref 20 do not match to each other. Further more, the Ref 7 and Ref 26 are the same reference, as are the Ref 9 and Ref 27.
Reference